Common Sense Media|medio Tiempo|median

Common Sense Media|medio Tiempo|median Solutions Why you should keep reading the mainstream media

Why you should keep reading the mainstream media



On January 26, the Trump administration announced that it would be cutting $10 million from the National Endowment for the Humanities.

While the move may seem like a good idea at the time, the cut comes with a number of troubling implications.

First, the administration is slashing funding to the National Institutes of Health, which supports humanities research, to save money on the Department of Defense’s Humanities Strategic Studies Program.

Second, the Department will also be defunding the Center for the Study of the Human Sciences at the University of California, Berkeley, to cut $300 million from its budget.

The Center for Humanities Studies is a collaboration between UC Berkeley and the National Science Foundation.

Its mission is to support a broad range of humanities research that will help to develop a more effective human-centered understanding of human society and the world.

It is a research institute whose mission is both scholarly and political.

The center has been a key component of the U.S. military’s human-rights record.

It has helped to establish the Human Rights Campaign, the leading LGBTQ advocacy group in the United States, and it is funded by the National Center for Transgender Equality, which was a member of the coalition that drafted the Human-Rights Bill of Rights.

In addition, the Center is an important resource for the Office of Naval Research, which oversees U.s. military research.

It offers a unique combination of academic research and strategic engagement.

And in 2017, the NIEH was established as a permanent member of NSCI, the National Council for Science and Technology.

This new cut will cut funding for both NSCIs research programs and NIEHS grants.

The NIEHR is the oldest federally funded federal program for humanities research.

Its inception in 1916 was to study the relationship between science and literature.

But as the field of humanistic inquiry has grown and the country has become more technologically advanced, the government has been looking to cut funding to its program.

In the past few years, NIEHD has faced criticism from a variety of groups, including the American Association of University Professors and the Humanists Alliance.

Both groups are concerned about the cuts and say that funding is essential to the development of a more comprehensive and diverse understanding of humanity.

While this new cut is particularly troubling, it doesn’t seem to be limited to the humanities.

The U. S. Senate has also taken aim at NIEHQ funding, which includes support for a wide range of research, including programs in history, psychology, anthropology, sociology, linguistics, art history, and the social sciences.

The Senate Appropriations Committee announced this month that it will eliminate NIEHH funding, along with a variety in other programs that support research and research assistantships.

These programs help people who may be disadvantaged in careers or in life, or to gain skills needed to succeed in careers.

These are programs that have a positive impact on the well-being of all Americans, but they can also cost money to the government and the American public.

If the cuts to NIEHT funding are continued, this will further diminish the effectiveness of these programs.

The impact of these cuts could be particularly acute in humanities programs.

It’s clear that the Trump Administration sees humanities research as a key part of its efforts to advance its agenda on advancing American interests in the world and protecting the interests of our military.

The Trump Administration is also cutting NIEHE funding to research centers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the University to fund programs to advance NASA and the military.

These cuts come at a time when the U:S.

government is under pressure to reduce its budget and increase the military budget.

President Trump has pledged to spend less on the military, but the cuts will further undercut that goal.

It will also have a negative impact on our ability to fund humanities research and support programs that can help us build a more robust and prosperous society.

These two programs represent some of the most important and enduring programs in the humanities, and we need to ensure that they are protected.

While some of these cutbacks will make sense politically, others will harm our ability for humanities scholars to advance our understanding of society and to provide valuable insights into our society’s challenges.

For example, cutting NCEHE funding would reduce our ability not only to fund basic research that advances the science of the human condition, but also to fund research that explores the social, political, and economic dimensions of human nature and human society.

NCEHR funding, and particularly NCEH funding, is critical to our ability, as scientists, to understand human nature, human society, and our collective responsibility for the planet and its future.

These cutting cuts will have a significant and negative impact.

If these cuts are continued in the near future, they will impact not only humanities research but also all aspects of American society.

This could have a profound impact on America’s future as a country.

NIEh funding helps to make America a leader in science and technology and on human history. The

TopBack to Top